View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Organism groups follow NCBI Taxonomy: the spellings of one organism are merged, a claim naming several organisms sits in each group, and claims whose value names no organism are under “not stated”.
not stated 53 Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High density offered little advantage over medium density.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatormedium density e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage in favour of the high density when compared with the medium density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–474 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Little advantage is expected from subsoil testing for annual crops.
Qualifierlittle advantage would be expected e2 Verbatim
e2 “little advantage would be expected from subsoil testing for annual crops ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 263–335 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Allowing unchopped silage to reach 100°F offered little or no advantage .
Treatmentallowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F e0 Outcomelittle or no advantage e0 Directionlittle or no advantage e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There appeared to be little or no advantage in allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–620 Other claims from this paper (2) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Exponential functions offered little advantage over polynomials in model tests.
Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “exponential functions have little advantage over polynomials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 215–275 t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 Other claims from this paper (3) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Vigour testing offered little advantage under good soil conditions.
Qualifiersoil conditions were good e0 Comparatorvigour testing e0 Verbatim
e0 “no great advantage was gained from vigour testing when soil conditions were good ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–431 t0 “seed wheat lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–116 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors concluded awned breeding has little advantage in British conditions without severe drought.
Outcomelittle advantage to be gained at present by breeding awned varieties of wheat e0 Qualifierabsence of severe drought e0 SettingBritish conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “for British conditions in the absence of severe drought there is little advantage to be gained at present by breeding awned varieties of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1126 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Interplanting soybeans with sorgo or corn had little overall advantage .
Treatmentinterplanting of soybeans in the row with sorgo or corn e0 Outcomelittle overall advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “little overall advantage for interplanting of soybeans in the row with sorgo or corn in Illinois ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 241–337 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Temperature phasing alone showed little advantage for average seed yield rate over experimental values.
Treatmentphasic temperature control alone e0 Outcomeaverage seed yield rate e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 ComparatorUSU experimental values e0 Verbatim
e0 “The model simulations show little advantage in using phasic temperature control alone to increase average seed yield rate over the USU experimental values. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–501 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Deviation-type indices in soybean offered little practical advantage over direct selection for the corresponding quality traits.
Outcomelittle practical advantage e0 Comparatordirect selection for corresponding quality traits e0 Verbatim
e0 “in soybean offer little practical advantage over direct selection for corresponding quality traits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2024 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Self-grafting provided little advantage for Cherokee Purple and Crista.
Material‘Cherokee Purple’ and ‘Crista’ e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage for self-grafting of ‘Cherokee Purple’ and ‘Crista’ ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1432 t0 “Tomatoes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 66–74 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Degree-day accumulations showed little advantage over calendar days after ease of calculation was considered.
Treatmentdegree-day accumulations e0 Outcomelittle advantage e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatorcalendar days e0 Verbatim
t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–55 e0 “The use of degree-day accumulations showed little advantage over calendar days when the ease of calculation for calendar days was considered. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–150 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Mixing kasugamycin with other fungicides gave little advantage in bacterial spot control.
Treatmentmixing kasugamycin with other fungicides e0 DirectionLittle advantage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Little advantage in disease control was observed by mixing kasugamycin with other fungicides. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–459 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 94–100 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Starter fertilizer provided little agronomic advantage and no yield change versus untreated control.
Treatmentstarter fertilizer e0 Directionno positive or negative effect e0 Comparatoruntreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Little agronomic advantage was found in starter fertilizer, with no positive or negative effect on yield when compared to an untreated control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2518–2661 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 28–34 Other claims from this paper (18) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maize offers little advantage in a cotton–wheat–maize sequence.
Outcomelittle advantage e1 Verbatim
t0 “Sowing maize as a rotation crop in irrigated cotton cropping systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e1 “Maize is a suitable rotation crop for irrigated cotton in a two-crop sequence but is of little advantage in a cotton–wheat–maize sequence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2225 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Two-year cotton-corn rotation gave little long-term cotton yield advantage beyond soil organic carbon effects.
Treatmentrotating cotton with corn ( Zea mays L.) in a 2‐yr rotation e0 Outcomecotton yield advantage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “rotating cotton with corn ( Zea mays L.) in a 2‐yr rotation or with corn, winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in a 3‐yr rotation produced little long‐term cotton yield advantage beyond that associated with SOC. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–740 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 Other claims from this paper (11) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The selected simultaneous intercrops offered little advantage over monocropped maize.
Outcomesimultaneous planting of the crop species selected has little advantage e0 Comparatormonocropped maize e0 Verbatim
e0 “simultaneous planting of the crop species selected has little advantage over monocropped maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1657 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Random mating F2 before selection and inbreeding offers little to no advantage .
Outcomelittle to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Our results suggest little to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2014 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors infer little advantage of larger effective population sizes for short-term selection.
Outcomeusing larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection e0 Verbatim
e0 “little to no advantage of using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1572 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The plasmid conferred little or no selective advantage on calystegine-negative plants.
Treatmentcac catabolic plasmid e0 Outcomeselective advantage in the rhizosphere e0 Comparatorcalystegine‐negative plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “In contrast, the cac catabolic plasmid provided little or no selective advantage in the rhizosphere of calystegine‐negative plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1260 t0 “Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–155 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The furtive parasitoid had little indirect impact on plants.
Interactorfurtive parasitoid e5 parasite Outcomeindirect impact on plants e5 Verbatim
e5 “In contrast, the furtive parasitoid did not elicit a strong anti-predator response, had little indirect impact on plants, but generated very high CEs due to the advantage of ovipositing into a sedentary prey population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2169 e1 “Both parasitoid species, in general, had a negative impact on plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1393 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The furtive parasitoid generated very high consumptive effects due to ovipositing into a sedentary prey population.
Interactorfurtive parasitoid e5 parasite Qualifierdue to the advantage of ovipositing into a sedentary prey population e5 Verbatim
e5 “In contrast, the furtive parasitoid did not elicit a strong anti-predator response, had little indirect impact on plants, but generated very high CEs due to the advantage of ovipositing into a sedentary prey population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2169 e1 “Both parasitoid species, in general, had a negative impact on plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1393 Other claims from this paper (9) Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Accumulating six years of crops gave little advantage over four years in reducing the coefficient of variation.
Outcomecoefficient of variation e7 Directionlittle advantage e0 Verbatim
t0 “Apple Trials ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–50 e0 “six years gave little advantage over four ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 318–359 e7 “obtain a low coefficient of variation ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–279 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Low oxygen controlled atmosphere storage was unsuitable or offered little advantage for Ballarat, Delicious, Granny Smith, and Kidd’s Orange Red apples.
MaterialBallarat, Delicious, Granny Smith, and Kidd's Orange Red e0 Outcomeunsuitable, or shows little advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “It is unsuitable, or shows little advantage , for the varieties Ballarat, Delicious, Granny Smith, and Kidd's Orange Red apples ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–472 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors find little advantage to M IX rootstock for shortening apple juvenility unless orchard space is limited.
Outcomeusing a rootstock such as M IX for shortening the juvenile period e0 Qualifierunless orchard space is limited e0 Verbatim
e0 “unless orchard space is limited, there is little advantage in using a rootstock such as M IX for shortening the juvenile period of apple seedlings. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 728–875 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper leaf readings offered little or no advantage .
Organ / stageupper leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “little or no advantage was found for taking CMR from the upper leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1516 t0 “corn leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Inhibitors added to surface banded urea solution showed little advantage .
Treatmentinhibitors added to urea solutions applied in bands at the surface e0 Outcomelittle advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The data show little advantage for inhibitors added to urea solutions applied in bands at the surface ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–909 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
At early tassel, nutrient content gave little predictive advantage over nutrient concentration in different plant parts.
Organ / stageearly tassel e0 Outcomepredicting yields e0 Directionlittle advantage e0 Comparatornutrient concentration in different plant parts e0 Verbatim
e0 “At early tassel there was little advantage in using nutrient content for predicting yields when compared to nutrient concentration in different plant parts. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1188 e1 “corn ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–96 Other claims from this paper (5) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors conclude mixtures offer little hay yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures.
Outcomelittle yield advantage e0 Qualifierwhen harvested as hay e0 Comparatoralfalfa monocultures e0 Verbatim
e0 “alfalfa‐grass mixtures offer little yield advantage over alfalfa monocultures when harvested as hay ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1345–1444 Other claims from this paper (7) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The studied blends offered little advantage over a single well-adapted variety.
Outcomelittle advantage of the blends studied over a single well‐adapted variety e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage of the blends studied over a single well‐adapted variety. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1798–1882 t0 “alfalfa ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 15–22 Other claims from this paper (9) Association author interpretation original result negative simulated Claim · model-written summary
A conserved lucerne price giving a comparable gross margin to arable crops would leave dairy farmers little feeding advantage .
Outcomeeconomic advantage e0 Qualifierthe price for conserved lucerne would have to be set at a level e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the price for conserved lucerne would have to be set at a level at which dairy farmers would derive little economic advantage from feeding it ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1121 Other claims from this paper (7) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.