View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Taxon groups are the verbatim names found in the abstracts (case-insensitive), not normalised: maize, corn and Zea mays are separate groups here. The Organism view merges them through NCBI Taxonomy.
Method / resource observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Vigour testing offered little advantage under good soil conditions.
soil conditions were good e0 vigour testing e0 Verbatim
e0 “no great advantage was gained from vigour testing when soil conditions were good ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–431 t0 “seed wheat lines ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 100–116 Other claims from this paper (3) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors concluded awned breeding has little advantage in British conditions without severe drought.
little advantage to be gained at present by breeding awned varieties of wheat e0 absence of severe drought e0 British conditions e0 Verbatim
e0 “for British conditions in the absence of severe drought there is little advantage to be gained at present by breeding awned varieties of wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1126 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Normal pollen had little competitive advantage over 3D-deficient pollen in selfed substitution monosomics.
little competitive advantage e0 pollen deficient for chromosome 3D e0 Verbatim
e0 “Normal pollen with chromosome 3D from Red Bobs had little competitive advantage over pollen deficient for chromosome 3D when a substituted monosomic line of wheat derived from the hybrid Rescue × Golden Ball was selfed. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–219 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Little millet with groundnut in 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher monetary advantage than sole little millet (Rs 320 and Rs 4891 per hectare).
little millet with groundnut in 2 :!, 2 :2 and 4 : 1 row ratios e2 monetary advantage e2 Rs 320llia and Rs 4891 ha e2 sole little millet e2 Verbatim
t0 “little millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 e2 “associztion of little millet with groundnut in 2 :!, 2 :2 and 4 : 1 row ratios were found more remunerative, which gave higher monetary advantage of Rs 320llia and Rs 4891 ha respectively than sole little millet. These treatments also accounted for higher nct return (212%232%), net return to RslRe investments (Rs 1.27-1.49), net returnlday (Rs 16.72- 1 8.31) and finally relative net return (Rs 1.59-1.70) over sole li… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–972 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Little millet demonstration plots yielded 1004 kg/ha versus 860 kg/ha in farmer practice, a 16.7 per cent advantage .
demonstration plots e1 farmers practice e1 Verbatim
e0 “1004 kg/ha in little millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1033–1060 e1 “recorded in demonstration plots compared to 1250 kg/ha and 860 kg/ha respectively in farmers practice with a yield advantage of 24.7 and 16.7 per cent respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1066–1229 e2 “average higher grain yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–995 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Little millet with groundnut in the 2:1, 2:2 and 4:1 row ratios gave higher net return (212%-232%) than sole little millet.
little millet with groundnut in 2 :!, 2 :2 and 4 : 1 row ratios e2 sole little millet e2 Verbatim
t0 “little millet ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–50 e2 “associztion of little millet with groundnut in 2 :!, 2 :2 and 4 : 1 row ratios were found more remunerative, which gave higher monetary advantage of Rs 320llia and Rs 4891 ha respectively than sole little millet. These treatments also accounted for higher nct return (212%232%), net return to RslRe investments (Rs 1.27-1.49), net returnlday (Rs 16.72- 1 8.31) and finally relative net return (Rs 1.59-1.70) over sole li… ” Show full quote
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 541–972 Other claims from this paper (8)
not stated 6 Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
High density offered little advantage over medium density.
little advantage e0 little advantage e0 medium density e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “There was little advantage in favour of the high density when compared with the medium density ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 380–474 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Allowing unchopped silage to reach 100°F offered little or no advantage .
allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F e0 little or no advantage e0 little or no advantage e0 Not reported Taxon Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “There appeared to be little or no advantage in allowing unchopped silage to heat to 100°F. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 530–620 Other claims from this paper (2) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude cutout mepiquat chloride offers little or no management, yield or fiber quality advantage .
little or no advantage in plant management, lint yield, or fiber quality e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “MC applied at cutout offers little or no advantage in plant management, lint yield, or fiber quality. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1511–1612 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Wuxi juicy peach had bigger fruit size.
other peach population e0 Verbatim
e0 “the population of Wuxi juicy peach had the character of little bit earlier phenophase,bigger and longer leaves,bigger fruit size,more sucrose and fructose content,higher sugar/sour ratio and less fruit firmness compared to other peach population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–487 t0 “Evaluation on Advantage Characteristics of Wuxi Juicy Peach Population and Exploration of Excellent Germplasms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wuxi juicy peach had less fruit firmness.
other peach population e0 Verbatim
e0 “the population of Wuxi juicy peach had the character of little bit earlier phenophase,bigger and longer leaves,bigger fruit size,more sucrose and fructose content,higher sugar/sour ratio and less fruit firmness compared to other peach population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–487 t0 “Evaluation on Advantage Characteristics of Wuxi Juicy Peach Population and Exploration of Excellent Germplasms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wuxi juicy peach had earlier phenophase than other peach populations.
other peach population e0 Verbatim
e0 “the population of Wuxi juicy peach had the character of little bit earlier phenophase,bigger and longer leaves,bigger fruit size,more sucrose and fructose content,higher sugar/sour ratio and less fruit firmness compared to other peach population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 242–487 t0 “Evaluation on Advantage Characteristics of Wuxi Juicy Peach Population and Exploration of Excellent Germplasms ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–110 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Starter fertilizer provided little agronomic advantage and no yield change versus untreated control.
starter fertilizer e0 no positive or negative effect e0 untreated control e0 Verbatim
e0 “Little agronomic advantage was found in starter fertilizer, with no positive or negative effect on yield when compared to an untreated control. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2518–2661 t0 “cotton ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 28–34 Other claims from this paper (18) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Maize offers little advantage in a cotton–wheat–maize sequence.
little advantage e1 Verbatim
t0 “Sowing maize as a rotation crop in irrigated cotton cropping systems ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–68 e1 “Maize is a suitable rotation crop for irrigated cotton in a two-crop sequence but is of little advantage in a cotton–wheat–maize sequence ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2088–2225 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Two-year cotton-corn rotation gave little long-term cotton yield advantage beyond soil organic carbon effects.
rotating cotton with corn ( Zea mays L.) in a 2‐yr rotation e0 cotton yield advantage e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “rotating cotton with corn ( Zea mays L.) in a 2‐yr rotation or with corn, winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.), and soybean [ Glycine max (L.) Merr.] in a 3‐yr rotation produced little long‐term cotton yield advantage beyond that associated with SOC. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 490–740 t0 “Cotton ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 92–98 Other claims from this paper (11) Recommendation author interpretation original result negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The selected simultaneous intercrops offered little advantage over monocropped maize.
simultaneous planting of the crop species selected has little advantage e0 monocropped maize e0 Verbatim
e0 “simultaneous planting of the crop species selected has little advantage over monocropped maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1657 Other claims from this paper (10) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Random mating F2 before selection and inbreeding offers little to no advantage .
little to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding e0 Verbatim
e0 “Our results suggest little to no advantage of random mating the F 2 before initiating selection and inbreeding ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1904–2014 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 22–27 Other claims from this paper (8) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Authors infer little advantage of larger effective population sizes for short-term selection.
using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection e0 Verbatim
e0 “little to no advantage of using larger effective population sizes to maintain genetic variability for short‐term recurrent selection ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1440–1572 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–67 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
Temperature phasing alone showed little advantage for average seed yield rate over experimental values.
phasic temperature control alone e0 average seed yield rate e0 little advantage e0 USU experimental values e0 Verbatim
e0 “The model simulations show little advantage in using phasic temperature control alone to increase average seed yield rate over the USU experimental values. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 346–501 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–54 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Deviation-type indices in soybean offered little practical advantage over direct selection for the corresponding quality traits.
little practical advantage e0 direct selection for corresponding quality traits e0 Verbatim
e0 “in soybean offer little practical advantage over direct selection for corresponding quality traits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1926–2024 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Roundup ready soybean yield was slightly lower than that of conventional soybean.
roundup ready soybean e1 conventional one e1 Verbatim
t0 “Discussion on Advantage and Disadvantage of Transgenic Soybean Resistant to Glyphosate ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–86 e1 “The yield of roundup ready soybean was little bit lower than the conventional one ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–538 Other claims from this paper (5) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Upper leaf readings offered little or no advantage .
upper leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “little or no advantage was found for taking CMR from the upper leaves. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1446–1516 t0 “corn leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–75 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Inhibitors added to surface banded urea solution showed little advantage .
inhibitors added to urea solutions applied in bands at the surface e0 little advantage e0 Verbatim
e0 “The data show little advantage for inhibitors added to urea solutions applied in bands at the surface ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–909 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–63 Other claims from this paper (10) Method / resource observed original result mixed measured Claim · model-written summary
At early tassel, nutrient content gave little predictive advantage over nutrient concentration in different plant parts.
early tassel e0 predicting yields e0 little advantage e0 nutrient concentration in different plant parts e0 Verbatim
e0 “At early tassel there was little advantage in using nutrient content for predicting yields when compared to nutrient concentration in different plant parts. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1188 e1 “corn ( Zea mays L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 77–96 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The plasmid conferred little or no selective advantage on calystegine-negative plants.
cac catabolic plasmid e0 selective advantage in the rhizosphere e0 calystegine‐negative plants e0 Verbatim
e0 “In contrast, the cac catabolic plasmid provided little or no selective advantage in the rhizosphere of calystegine‐negative plants. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1129–1260 t0 “Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–155 Other claims from this paper (3) Association observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
The furtive parasitoid had little indirect impact on plants.
furtive parasitoid e5 parasite indirect impact on plants e5 Verbatim
e5 “In contrast, the furtive parasitoid did not elicit a strong anti-predator response, had little indirect impact on plants, but generated very high CEs due to the advantage of ovipositing into a sedentary prey population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2169 e1 “Both parasitoid species, in general, had a negative impact on plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1393 Other claims from this paper (9) Association observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
The furtive parasitoid generated very high consumptive effects due to ovipositing into a sedentary prey population.
furtive parasitoid e5 parasite due to the advantage of ovipositing into a sedentary prey population e5 Verbatim
e5 “In contrast, the furtive parasitoid did not elicit a strong anti-predator response, had little indirect impact on plants, but generated very high CEs due to the advantage of ovipositing into a sedentary prey population ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1951–2169 e1 “Both parasitoid species, in general, had a negative impact on plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1325–1393 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate application conferred little overall advantage on steers on native pasture.
Superphosphate application e2 overall advantage e2 no_change inferred e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of discing and superphosphate application on the performance of steers grazing native pasture was examined over a period of three years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–146 e2 “Superphosphate application reduced dry season loss in one year, and reduced wet season gain in another year, but conferred little overall advantage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–408 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate application reduced dry season weight loss of steers in one year.
Superphosphate application e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of discing and superphosphate application on the performance of steers grazing native pasture was examined over a period of three years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–146 e2 “Superphosphate application reduced dry season loss in one year, and reduced wet season gain in another year, but conferred little overall advantage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–408 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Superphosphate application reduced wet season weight gain of steers in another year.
Superphosphate application e2 in another year e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The effect of discing and superphosphate application on the performance of steers grazing native pasture was examined over a period of three years ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–146 e2 “Superphosphate application reduced dry season loss in one year, and reduced wet season gain in another year, but conferred little overall advantage ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 261–408 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Triticum aestivumt0
Gossypium hirsutum
Zea mays
Glycine max
Zea mays subsp. mays
Sinorhizobium meliloti Rm41