View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper A claim can belong to several research areas, so group counts add up to more than the total.
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities .
Treatmentlow light intensities e1 Outcomedegree of inhibition e1 Comparatorhigh light intensities e1 Verbatim
e1 “The degree of inhibition was lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 646–736 e2 “in isolated spinach chloroplasts ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 75–107 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
High light intensities cause photoinhibition in tea.
Outcomephotoinhibition occurs e0 Qualifierhigh light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “photoinhibition occurs at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–880 t0 “Tea ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–20 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect author interpretation original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities , but not at winter light intensities .
Treatmentdeeper penetration of light in the canopy e0 Outcomecrop photosynthesis e0 Qualifierhigh light intensities (summer) e0 Comparatorlow light intensities (winter) e0 Verbatim
e0 “At high light intensities (summer) deeper penetration of light in the canopy improves crop photosynthesis, but not at low light intensities (winter). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1693 e1 “greenhouse-grown tomato crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–568 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect author interpretation original result mixed simulated Claim · model-written summary
Deeper light penetration improved tomato photosynthesis at summer light intensities , but not at winter light intensities .
Treatmentdeeper penetration of light in the canopy e0 Outcomecrop photosynthesis e0 Qualifierhigh light intensities (summer) e0 Comparatorlow light intensities (winter) e0 Verbatim
e0 “At high light intensities (summer) deeper penetration of light in the canopy improves crop photosynthesis, but not at low light intensities (winter). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1544–1693 e1 “greenhouse-grown tomato crop ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–568 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lawn grasses responded differently to the various light intensities in the growth characters measured.
Treatmentvarious light intensities e0 Outcomeresponded to various light intensities differently e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “Lawn grasses responded to various light intensities differently ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1234–1297 Other claims from this paper (9) Recommendation author interpretation original result basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that Mentha arvensis is best grown under low light intensities .
Outcomebest grown under low light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “Mentha arvensis is best grown under low light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1373 Other claims from this paper (3) Observation observed review summary negative basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
High light intensities cause photoinhibition in tea.
Outcomephotoinhibition occurs e0 Qualifierhigh light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “photoinhibition occurs at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–880 t0 “Tea ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–20 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance of low- light grown plants responded slowly to varied light intensities , whereas plants grown under natural light were more sensitive to changing light intensities .
Taxonyoung grape plants e1 Treatmentvaried light intensities e1 OutcomeTranspiration rate and stomatal conductance e1 Directionresponded slowly e1 Comparatornatural light environment e1 Verbatim
e1 “Transpiration rate and stomatal conductance responded slowly to varied light intensities , whereas the young grape plants grown under natural light environment were more sensitive to changing light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–1005 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Glyptostrobus is judged adapted to higher light intensities .
Outcomeadapted to higher light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “Glyptostrobus is adapted to higher light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 884–936 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Development and maturity of Brassica rapa were influenced by light intensities .
Treatmentlight intensities e3 Outcomedevelopment and maturity e3 Verbatim
t0 “Responses of Brassica rapa “Bokchoy” to Varying Light Intensities Grown Under Hydroponic System ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–95 e3 “Brassica rapa 's development and maturity were influenced by light intensities . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 459–537 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
High light intensities were required regardless of daylength.
Outcomehigh light intensities, independent of daylength, are required e0 Verbatim
e0 “high light intensities , independent of daylength, are required ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 178–240 t0 “Gladiolus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–102 Other claims from this paper (3) Mechanism author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Plants may use different phototropism mechanisms at different light intensities .
Qualifierdifferent mechanisms in response to different light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “plant may have different mechanisms in response to different light intensities in phototropism ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–303 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Urediniospore production of Puccinia striiformis on wheat was much lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities .
Treatmentlow light intensities e1 OutcomeUrediniospore production e1 Comparatorhigh light intensities e1 Verbatim
t1 “Puccinia striiformis on wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–104 e1 “Urediniospore production by Puccinia striiformis on wheat per unit leaf area infected was much lower at low light intensities than at high light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–156 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Sirococcus infection percentage was greater under low light intensities (900–3900 lx) than under high light intensities (4300 – 10 000 lx).
Treatmentlow light intensities (900–3900 lx) e1 Outcomepercentage infection e1 QualifierAt all temperature ranges e1 Comparatorrelatively high light intensities (4300 – 10 000 lx) e1 Verbatim
t0 “Environmental factors affecting Sirococcus shoot blight of black spruce ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–71 e1 “At all temperature ranges, the percentage infection was greater under low light intensities (900–3900 lx) than under relatively high light intensities (4300 – 10 000 lx) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1126 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Root colonization was greatest at intermediate light intensities .
Outcomepercent root length colonized e0 Qualifierintermediate light intensities e0 Not reported Taxon
Verbatim
e0 “At intermediate light intensities , percent root length colonized was greatest ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–780 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mean germination time differed significantly across light intensities .
Treatmentdifferent light intensities e1 Outcomemean germination time e0 Not reported Comparator Direction
Verbatim
e0 “but the mean germination time had significant difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–412 t0 “Poaceae ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 36–43 e1 “under different light intensities no significant difference ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 258–317 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Such low light intensities may prevent the invasion of other plant species.
Outcomethe invasion of other plant species e5 QualifierSuch low light intensities e5 Verbatim
e0 “Sasa kurilensis community at Mt. Waisuhorun ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 97–140 e5 “Such low light intensities can prevent the invasion of other plant species ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1131 Other claims from this paper (18) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Elodea nuttallii growth was reduced at higher light intensities .
Treatmenthigher intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “E. nuttallii thrived under low light conditions but exhibited reduced growth at higher intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1490 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Chloroplast translation activation occurs already at moderate light intensities in tobacco.
Outcometranslation activation e0 Settingmoderate light intensities e0 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
t0 “Tobacco ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 90–97 e0 “translation activation occurs already at moderate light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–67 Other claims from this paper (1) Association observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
CtHCT3 expression correlated significantly and negatively with kaempferol content across light intensities .
Treatmentdifferent light intensities e0 Outcomekaempferol content e0 Verbatim
e0 “CtHCT3 gene expression showed a significantly negative correlation with kaempferol content in safflower grown under different light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1615–1758 Other claims from this paper (6) Mechanism author interpretation review summary basis n/a Claim · model-written summary
Plants may use different phototropism mechanisms at different light intensities .
Qualifierdifferent mechanisms in response to different light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “plant may have different mechanisms in response to different light intensities in phototropism ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 209–303 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Measured light intensities 2 m and 3.3 m down into the canopy corresponded to intensities estimated by current canopy models.
Outcomelight intensities e0 Qualifier2 m and 3.3 m down into the tree canopy e0 Comparatorcurrent canopy models e0 Verbatim
e0 “Measured light intensities 2 m and 3.3 m down into the tree canopy corresponded to intensities estimated by using current canopy models ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–887 t0 “white oak ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 87–96 Other claims from this paper (12) Method / resource observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Live-cell RESOLFT nanoscopy uses comparatively low light doses and intensities to overcome the diffraction barrier.
Outcomelight doses and intensities e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–62 e1 “requires and utilizes comparatively low light doses and intensities to overcome the diffraction barrier ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–422 Other claims from this paper (5) Method / resource observed original result simulated Claim · model-written summary
The model simulated qE kinetics at low and high light intensities .
Comparatorlow and high light intensities e0 Verbatim
e0 “The model is able to simulate the kinetics of qE at low and high light intensities . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 546–629 e1 “The majority of NPQ in plants ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 134–163 Other claims from this paper (1)
not stated 11 Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
More pistillate flowers reached anthesis under the two highest light intensities .
Treatmenthighest 2 light intensities e0 Outcomepistillate flowers reached anthesis e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “more pistillate flowers reached anthesis under the highest 2 light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 319–397 t0 “cucumber ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 32–40 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
MSU 713-5 produced no staminate flowers across light intensities .
Outcomeno staminate flowers e0 Verbatim
e0 “A gynoecious line, MSU 713-5, produced no staminate flowers under varying light intensities ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–490 t0 “cucumber ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 32–40 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Gynoecious hybrids produced staminate flowers across light intensities .
Materialgynoecious hybrids e0 Outcomegynoecious hybrids did e0 Verbatim
e0 “however gynoecious hybrids did ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 492–522 t0 “cucumber ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 32–40 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.